Insulting environmentalist leader calls CORE's Niger Innis "insane" for supporting increased energy drilling

The story is in E&E Publications ClimateWire edition of July 30, 2008:

Leaders jockey to present unified African American climate platform

(07/30/2008)
Jenny Mandel, ClimateWire reporter

A clamor is growing on Capitol Hill as groups vie to become the voice of
African Americans on climate change -- and to serve up what could be a
politically important constituency in the fight over capping carbon
emissions.

But yesterday's launch of a Commission to Engage African Americans on
Climate Change showed that groups will have to speak clearly and firmly to
be heard through the din, and choosing their words could be tricky.

The commission of 15 leaders, academics and activists -- most of them
African American -- says it will strive to bring the black community into
the global warming debate and build a coalition encompassing everyone from
scientists and teachers to religious leaders and entrepreneurs.

House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) stressed that the group is sorely
needed because African Americans are disproportionately affected by climate
change. But in addition to challenges, there are "new opportunities and
economies behind our efforts to combat climate change," he said.

But when the floor was opened to questions, the discussion quickly
splintered.

First, a black man identifying himself as a business owner in the
Washington, D.C., area gained the microphone and refused to let it go,
speaking at length against high gas prices and environmental groups that
fail to address the problems of ordinary people.

"We are being hurt," he said repeatedly, and finally security was called to
escort him away.

Soon afterward, a white man claiming membership in the Congress on Racial
Equality (CORE) stood up to say that climate change skeptics were not being
heard. Saying the leading cause of coal-related deaths was a lack of heating
and air conditioning for poor people, the man questioned whether energy cost
issues were adequately covered by the commission's make-up.

CORE spokesman Niger Innis has acknowledged taking funds from Exxon Mobil.
Two weeks ago, CORE, along with pro-drilling group Americans for American
Energy, hosted a rally in Washington to promote domestic drilling as part of
a campaign to "stop the war on the poor" (Greenwire
<http://www.eenews.net/Greenwire/2008/07/17/archive/1> , July 17).

A one-sided dialogue?

The interjections put Rodney Ellis, a Texas state senator who co-chairs the
commission, in a tricky spot. Noting that his Texas district lines mean that
he represents "more oil companies than anyone in the room," Ellis said the
Commission aims to create a dialogue for African Americans in which not
everyone has to agree.

Ralph Everett, the commission's other co-chairman and president and chief
executive of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, a think
tank focusing on African American issues, concurred.

"I respect everyone who's spoken here," he said. "No views are out of
bounds."

At the same time, he said, the group will strive for consensus in its
activities, but decisions will not necessarily be unanimous. "There's no
particular secret or game plan here," he said. "We're happy to have
different views."

After the event, though, CORE sent out a press release denouncing the
Commission as "an unholy alliance of environmental extremists and left-wing
politicians" and chastising Rep. Clyburn for his support of it. "Forming a
commission to engage blacks in climate change is patronizing and insulting,"
Innis said.

Climate checks to ease the pain

If CORE represents one end of the spectrum, further toward the center is a
sliver of the environmental justice community, groups like those in the
Environmental Justice and Climate Change Initiative, which argue that a
cap-and-trade system to regulate carbon emissions is too complicated to work
fairly in the interests of poor communities (ClimateWire
<http://www.eenews.net/climatewire/2008/07/25/archive/7> , July 25).

On the other side is the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), a
liberal think tank based in Washington, D.C., that supports a system for
trading emissions credits -- and then divvying up the proceeds to help
low-income citizens.

CBPP is arguing for a "climate rebate," explained Martha Cowan, a senior
legislative associate working on the issue.

The group estimates that reducing the nation's carbon emissions by 15
percent would cost about $750 per household. A cap-and-trade system would
create a huge new revenue stream that should be used partly to offset that
burden, Cowan said, explaining that about 14 percent of the estimated
revenue would cover the cost of rebates.

Such rebates could be made through the tax system for many Americans, Cowan
said, while many of those who don't make enough to pay that amount in taxes
could be reached by directly depositing funds onto the electronic debit
cards used by programs like the Agriculture Department's Women, Infants and
Children, or WIC, program.

Reaching those who are eligible for such benefits but do not collect them
could be difficult, she acknowledges, but channeling some funding through
the federal Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program could help.

Competing for slices of the carbon pie

Cowan thinks the recent surge in interest around African Americans' views on
climate change stems in part from the climate legislation that has appeared
in Congress this year.

"We all benefited from the Senate dress rehearsal on this," she said.

Cowan maintained that those opposed to the idea of carbon rebates are mostly
those competing for money from the same carbon pot. Key among those, of
course, are businesses that rely on carbon emissions and are lobbying for
handouts and research help to offset the costs associated with compliance.

A number of religious groups have been partners with CBPP in their climate
work, and Cowan expects more nonprofits to jump into the fray in the next
several months, gearing up for possible legislative action in the next
Congress.

A group already deeply engaged on environmental issues in one African
American community is Sustainable South Bronx. That organization has worked
since 2001 on the twin goals of "environmental and economic rebirth" for the
poor community just north of Manhattan.

James Burling Chase, the group's communications director, called CORE's
platform "a nightmare," strongly denying that environmental groups are at
odds with poor peoples' interests.

Hands in the dirt, fighting climate change

"It's incredibly short-sighted and a bit dishonest," Chase said. "Certainly,
when it comes to the drilling part, the idea that poor people are going to
benefit from more drilling ... is insane."


Sustainable South Bronx runs Bronx Environmental Stewardship Training, a job
training program that works with low-income residents, many of them former
drug offenders, to teach green roof maintenance, river bank restoration,
hazardous materials handling and other hard skills that can be used for
local remediation projects. The program also teaches soft skills crucial for
winning, and keeping, a job.

Chase said addressing climate change rarely makes it into the program's
pitch to would-be participants, who are more focused on landing a paycheck
and doing something about the pollution and environmental degradation that
hurt living standards in their neighborhoods.

Now, with oil prices high, the group is expanding to start a new arm of the
program focused on energy efficiency retrofits and alternative energy
installations, he said. "By the time you're up to getting oil out of shale,
you could employ millions of Americans to completely retrofit and green up
our cities" and never need that oil.

#  #  #

Who pays the insulting Mr. Chase to say such outrageous things about a decent and honored civil rights leaders?
Here are some of Mr. Chase's major supporters and the cash they have poured into his intolerant organization, according to GuideStar's Grant Explorer, available at www.guidestar.org.

Funders of Sustainable South Bronx

 Funder FY Ending Amount
DEUTSCHE BANK AMERICAS FOUNDATION 2005 $10,000
J M KAPLAN FUND INC 2005 $40,000
JESSIE SMITH NOYES FOUNDATION INC 2005 $20,000
JOHN D & CATHERINE T MACARTHUR FOUNDATION 2005 $500,000
Merck Family Fund 2005 $25,279
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2005 $22,500
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2005 $22,500
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2005 $22,500
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION 2005 $39,477
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION 2005 $35,000
Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Inc. 2005 $17,500
SCHERMAN FOUNDATION INC 2005 $30,000
HYDE AND WATSON FOUNDATION 2004 $5,000
JESSIE SMITH NOYES FOUNDATION INC 2004 $9,700
JESSIE SMITH NOYES FOUNDATION INC 2004 $21,000
LOVE 4 ONE ANOTHER CHARITIES 2004 $7,000
MARY FLAGLER CARY CHARITABLE TRUST 2004 $15,000
Merck Family Fund 2004 $25,000
Merck Family Fund 2004 $25,274
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2004 $22,500
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2004 $22,500
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2004 $22,500
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION 2004 $50,000
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION 2004 $90,000
DEUTSCHE BANK AMERICAS FOUNDATION 2003 $5,000
INDEPENDENCE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 2003 $7,500
J M KAPLAN FUND INC 2003 $30,000
JESSIE SMITH NOYES FOUNDATION INC 2003 $20,000
Merck Family Fund 2003 $25,000
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2003 $22,500
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2003 $22,500
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION 2003 $140,000
SCHERMAN FOUNDATION INC 2003 $30,000
Merck Family Fund 2002 $25,622
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2002 $22,500
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2002 $21,250
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2002 $22,500
SCHERMAN FOUNDATION INC 2002 $15,000
DEUTSCHE BANK AMERICAS FOUNDATION 2001 $5,000
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2001 $21,250
NEW YORK FOUNDATION 2001 $21,250
OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE 2001 $22,954
Newsletter Subscription
Coming Soon!

Watch Ron Arnold on Fox News
Visit Ron's other website
The Green Tracking Library

Ron is available to speak at your next convention or seminar.  Call 425-455-5038

Latest Report Releases:

Subverting Development:
   America's Industrial Strength at Risk
The national environmental policy act has degenerated from a high-minded law to promote productive harmony into a weapon to stop all development.
►Autocrats and Activists
How Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro use Venezuela’s Citgo Oil to mobilize U.S. leftists to subvert free enterprise at home.


Latest Book Releases: